CMAS logo
I keep coming on here, putting in my two cents’ worth about other people’s logos, so I thought I’d post a logo that I’m currently working on, to get some feedback. I struggle with logos, and it’s probably my least favorite thing to do, but I managed to get assigned this one. Yipee.
The logo is for a huge, global department, that has had no rhyme or reason to any of their documents, sign-age, powerpoint presentations, etc. The department is called “CMAS,” short for Chemistry, Materials and Analytical Sciences. They mostly do materials innovation and appliance forensics, meaning they come up with new materials (plastics, resins, coatings, etc.) and figure out what went wrong when something on an appliance goes bad (cracked shelves, dysfunctional parts, corrosion, etc.). Most of it is waaaay over my head.
Each CMAS lab is basically a big chemistry lab with a lot of really hi-tech equipment, so I made a periodic table, and shrunk it down to make it more compact. It took the shape of a building, which fits, because part of what they do is make materials out of the elements, or study the materials to see what elements it contains (to check for possible material contamination). The bottom logo is just another version of the top logo, to be used when the text would become too hard to read. Any feedback would be much appreciated.
by Jenna | 11.24.08 | alumni | 2 Comments »

Hi Jenna!
I like where this one is going… the periodic table is squished, which makes it read like an audioform on a stereo almost… I think you could make the logo treatment work in the table’s original format: http://61.19.145.8/student/m5year2006-2/502/group11/periodic_table.gif
Unless they specifically requested for a rectangular logo. The blue line on the smaller version seems somewhat unnecessary. But overall, the different weights of type are nice… though, that “collaboration for innovation” line seems a bit out of place in the bottom left corner like that. Perhaps it could go under CMAS?
Also, “collaboration for innovation” seems like the more important tag, with “Chemistry, Materials & Analytical Sciences” as the descriptor.
I agree with the comment about the proportion of the table. I Immediately read it as an equalizer. I think the periodic table is probably a good direction though.
Have you considered presenting the acronym as periodic elements? Something similar to what adobe did with the CS3 icons… Just a thought, probably already done a million times though. Or maybe explore the idea of deconstruction to echo the material forensics.